Let us keep the carbon, for next glacial age!
By Denis Delbecq • February 16th, 2009 in 11:31 · Category: Actuality
It is a point of view at least original. A Danish researcher explains that it is necessary to keep reservations of hydrocarbons to struggle against next glacial age.
In Geophysical research letters of February 11th, 2009, Gary Shaffer, the University of Copenhagen, itemises his calculations and envisages that a climatic warming of five degrees in century, such as he is estimated by the models of the UNO, would postpone of 170 000 years the happening of next glacial age. And the researcher explains, that if the humanity wanted to take the trouble to keep its reservations of coal, of oil and of gas, she could be slow a half million years next glacial expiry date.
Before industrial revolution, our climate was only dependent on solar activity, and also on variations of the orbit of the Earth which condition the quantity of solar energy accepted on the planet. When she diminishes, the summer does not any more allow to melt the glacial skull caps and the Arctic floes, and these go down more to the south, recuperating all north of Europe and of Asia and of North America.
For Shaffer, it is therefore urgent to imagine a long-term climatic management. By avoiding burning now its reservations of carbon, the humanity could therefore attenuate ongoing total warming, while keeping cartouches to postpone, by controlling an increase in its rejections of carbon dioxide, the come instant, the appearance of a glacial age which would be no doubt, distasteful to live. It was necessary to think of it!
Article read 670 times. Tags:âge glacial, climate, energy, carbon dioxide, climatic rechauffement



Comments in 
The man participates at the level of 7 % against 93 % of origin " Bio "!!!
The first heater is our Sun, completely absent of debate, the hot source of our hellish thermal machine is however …
Would not be there not any lacunas to our dear media?
Let us look things in the face CO2 is a bearing business today:
200 M$ before they speak about it since +/-10 years,
200 000 M$ at present …
Of what to finance some lobby' s …
Furthermore there is mixture of types: the supporters and the aboutiassants of this new market are often the same.
Something else:
Let us cut legs in idée reçue, the first gas with greenhouse effect is the steam of water and not of CO2, must come then the methane.
References of figures: "ADEME" and "Global Warming Art"